Welcome to HPA. Please login or sign up.

Members
  • Total Members: 281
  • Latest: faif2d
Stats
  • Total Posts: 2,975
  • Total Topics: 284
  • Online today: 11
  • Online ever: 59 (Jan 03, 2026, 02:30 PM)
Users Online
  • Users: 0
  • Guests: 2
  • Total: 2

Recent topics

downthrust on biplane pusher models

Started by dputt7, Jan 07, 2026, 04:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

g_kandylakis

Well, it has already been mentioning, but while uploading the Supermarine Walrus Profile publication on the Plan Gallery, I had a look again and thought I 'd post a page here as well...

Quite a lot of "rearwards downthrust" in most examples we have seen, almost never the other way around.

George

The complete issue:
https://hpa.aeromodelling.gr/plans/details.php?image_id=932

OZPAF

I'm not sure if this has been done to provide an additional nose down pitching moment or the reverse!

As the high mounted motor would apply a nose down pitching moment to offset a possible nose up effect from the drag(this doesn't look likely), then perhaps it has been angled to direct the air flow onto the tail.

There is a comment in the design coverage, stating that the engine nacelle was angled to starboard to give better airflow onto the tail for balance(ie trim balance). Thus the thrust line angle in elevation may be to offset the high thrust line?

Details, details.

Thanks Gary for an interesting report.

John

dputt7

What a great resource this has become so quickly.  I am sure that the up elevator is the key. Get it to glide with some up elevator set the motor to 0 deg.s and find some LOOOONG grass. Can't wait to start the rebuild and do some testing, just have to finish my current project.
                       Thanks to all that contributed
                                               Dave

OZPAF

QuoteThere is a comment in the design coverage, stating that the engine nacelle was angled to starboard to give better airflow onto the tail for balance(ie trim balance).

I was a little confusing here - the nacelle was angled to starboard in plan - possibly to offset torque. However as they were considering prop airflow effects on the fin - I feel that they would also have considered it for trim in pitch. This would have been very effective due to the tail being so close to the prop - in plan and elevation.

That sounds good - however I suspect that if I'm correct - the elevator trim setting will be different under power and on the glide.

John